Campos dos Goytacazes — UN urban centre population
Campos dos Goytacazes has a recorded base population of 310,590 for the UN urban centre definition (2025 annual estimate). UN DESA, World Urbanization Prospects 2025; the moving counter uses UN 2025–2026 annual growth, not new population observations.
At a glance
Separate UN urban-centre definition
Campos dos Goytacazes UN urban centre: 310,590 people (2025), equal to the displayed UN urban centre figure of 310,590. Separate GeoNames settlement record: 483,540; the UN value is smaller (different boundaries; GeoNames population date unavailable). UN WUP 2025 Degree of Urbanisation; not a municipal/province boundary. Association: name/country/coordinates matched; boundary relationship unverified. No containment claim is made.
Comparable database records
Same definition label: UN urban centre. Dates/boundaries may still differ; this is not a harmonised international city ranking. Ratios use 310,590 as denominator.
| Place | Population | vs Campos dos Goytacazes |
|---|---|---|
| Aktau | 310,607 | +0.0% |
| Sungai Petani | 310,566 | −0.0% |
| Gorgān | 310,644 | +0.0% |
| Cluj-Napoca | 310,650 | +0.0% |
| Kanggye | 310,432 | −0.1% |
About these numbers
Source: UN DESA, World Urbanization Prospects 2025. Reference: 2025 annual estimate. Live method: exponential projection from modelling anchor 2025-01-01 using UN 2025–2026 annual growth (+0.11% per year). This anchor is a modelling convention, not an observed population date. Tiles, ranks and comparisons use the recorded base figure 310,590, not the ticking estimate. Country/world denominators are World Bank values and can differ in date and method from local/UN values. Ranks cover only records with the same definition label in this database, not all cities in the world.
What changed during your lifetime?
Turn these figures into a private, five-scene personal world story.
Which city boundary are you reading?
This page is a structured reference entry. Its sources, geographic definition and reference dates determine what the figures mean; it is not independent reporting about the causes of change. Read the accompanying explanation before comparing different places or vintages.